AMAURY DOMINGUEZ v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
This text of AMAURY DOMINGUEZ v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC (AMAURY DOMINGUEZ v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
AMAURY DOMINGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, CITY OF DANIA BEACH, YANELVYS AGUIAR, and Unknown Tenant In Possession #1, Appellees.
No. 4D16-3164
[July 12, 2017]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-24879 CACE (11).
Michael Farrar, Doral, for appellant.
Charles P. Gufford of McCalla Raymer Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for appellee Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC.
PER CURIAM.
Amaury Dominguez challenges an order awarding the servicer the costs of post-foreclosure judgment expenditures in relation to the subject property. We reverse and remand because the affidavit of additional advances filed by the servicer and not admitted into evidence was wholly inadequate to prove the amounts of the servicer’s expenditures. See generally Broxmeyer v. Elie, 647 So. 2d 893, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“Where there is no proof of damages, there can be no recovery.”). On remand, the servicer must prove the expenses incurred and its entitlement to reimbursement for those expenses pursuant to the final judgment.
Reversed and remanded.
DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN, JJ., and HANZMAN, MICHAEL A., Associate Judge, concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AMAURY DOMINGUEZ v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amaury-dominguez-v-bayview-loan-servicing-llc-fladistctapp-2017.