Amatucci v. Young
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Josephine Amatucci v. Case No. 18-cv-1227-SM
Richard M. Young, Jr., et al
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 29, 2021 for the reasons stated therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). So Ordered.
____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge
Date: January 21, 2022
cc: Josephine Amatucci, pro se Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amatucci v. Young (Amatucci v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.