Amatrone v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
This text of Amatrone v. State Farm Fire and Cas. (Amatrone v. State Farm Fire and Cas.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
NICHOLAS JAMES AMATRONE, No. 70660 Appellant, vs. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY; STATE FARM INSURANCE AGENCY; GREGORY A. MOORE; BELFOR FILED RESTORATION; DOUGLAS WOOD; AUG 22 2016 ROBIN SINGER; WILLIAMS TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT ELECTRICS; AND ROBERT SY ANIATRONE, DEPUTY CLERK
Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order granting appellant's motion for a jury trial and denying appellant's motion to add defendants. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals two jurisdictional defects. Specifically, it appears that the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to add defendants. In addition, it appears that appellant is not an aggrieved party with standing to appeal from that portion of the order granting appellant's motion for a jury trial. See NRAP 3A(a); Valley Bank of Nevada v.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A Ito -254113 Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 874 P.2d 729 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
Cherry Oni J. Douglas
Gibboris
cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Nicholas James Amatrone Ames & Ames, LLP Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP/Las Vegas Morris PoLich & Purdy, LLP/Las Vegas Pecos Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
'We deny as moot respondent State Farm Fire and Casualty's motion to dismiss, and we deny its request for fees.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0J 1947A e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amatrone v. State Farm Fire and Cas., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amatrone-v-state-farm-fire-and-cas-nev-2016.