Amato v. Brady
This text of 2022 Ohio 1723 (Amato v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Amato v. Brady, 2022-Ohio-1723.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
JAMES A. AMATO, CASE NO. 2022-L-015 TRUSTEE,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas -v-
SPENCER BRADY, Trial Court No. 2021 JL 003335
Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: May 23, 2022 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
David D. Briller, David D. Briller Co., L.P.A., 7379 Pearl Road, Suite 4, Middleburg Heights, OH 44130 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Spencer Brady, pro se, 802 East 305th Street, Willowick, OH 44095 (Defendant- Appellant).
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.
{¶1} On March 2, 2022, appellant, Spencer Brady, filed a pro se appeal from the
Lake County Court of Common Pleas July 20, 2021 entry. Appellee, James A. Amato
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. Appellant filed no opposition to the
motion to dismiss.
{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing
a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has
held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17,
citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988).
{¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal
from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of
courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the
judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the
time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance
docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005-Ohio-5360.
{¶4} Here, the trial court issued its entry on July 20, 2021. The clerk of courts
noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R. 58(B) was issued
to the parties on that same date. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal
began to run from July 20, 2021. The deadline for appellant to file his notice of appeal
was August 19, 2021, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s March 2,
2022 appeal was untimely filed by over six months.
{¶5} This court may not extend the time to appeal in civil cases. Pendell, supra
at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).
{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
This appeal is dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).
MATT LYNCH, J.,
JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2022-L-015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 Ohio 1723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amato-v-brady-ohioctapp-2022.