Amarjit Singh v. Loretta E. Lynch

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3003

___________________________

Amarjit Singh; Manjit Kaur; Dripinder Singh

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners

v.

Loretta E. Lynch,1 Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

Submitted: May 5, 2015 Filed: May 14, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

1 Loretta E. Lynch is substituted for her predecessor, Eric H. Holder, Jr., as the Attorney General of the United States. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________