Amarillo, Channing, Dalhart and Lubbock v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amarillo, Channing, Dalhart and Lubbock v. Railroad Commission of Texas. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 5524
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 25, 2016·No. 08-14-00193-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ AMARILLO, CHANNING, DALHART, No. 08-14-00193-CV AND LUBBOCK, § Appeal from Appellants, § 53rd District Court v. § of Travis County, Texas RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS, § (TC # D-1-GN-12-003997) Appellee. §

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellants to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amarillo, Channing, Dalhart and Lubbock v. Railroad Commission of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Amarillo, Channing, Dalhart and Lubbock v. Railroad Commission of Texas (Amarillo, Channing, Dalhart and Lubbock v. Railroad Commission of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.