Amarena v. DiNapoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amarena v. DiNapoli

89 A.D.3d 1362, 934 N.Y.2d 535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 A.D.3d 1362 (Amarena v. DiNapoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amarena v. DiNapoli, 89 A.D.3d 1362, 934 N.Y.2d 535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Peters, J.P

Petitioner, a correction officer, suffered a heart attack in May 2002. He thereafter applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits, contending that he was permanently disabled due to a heart condition. The New York State and Local Retirement System found that petitioner was permanently incapacitated from performing his job duties, but nonetheless denied his application. Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer upheld the denial, finding that the Retirement System had rebutted the “heart presumption” (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 507-b [c]) and that petitioner had not established that he was permanently disabled from the performance of his job duties. Respondent made supplemental findings of fact and denied the application solely on the ground that the heart presumption had been rebutted and petitioner had not established that his permanent incapacity was caused by the direct act of an inmate. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent’s determination.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that respondent has agreed to annul his determination and return the matter to the Retirement System for further proceedings. We therefore conclude that this matter is moot, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all the relief that he is entitled (see Matter of Stage v DiNapoli, 86 AD3d 857, 858 [2011]; Matter of Neeley v Town of Colonie, 79 AD3d 1560, 1561 [2010]).

Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters, J.P

Petitioner, a correction officer, suffered a heart attack in May 2002. He thereafter applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits, contending that he was permanently disabled due to a heart condition. The New York State and Local Retirement System found that petitioner was permanently incapacitated from performing his job duties, but nonetheless denied his application. Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer upheld the denial, finding that the Retirement System had rebutted the “heart presumption” (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 507-b [c]) and that petitioner had not established that he was permanently disabled from the performance of his job duties. Respondent made supplemental findings of fact and denied the application solely on the ground that the heart presumption had been rebutted and petitioner had not established that his permanent incapacity was caused by the direct act of an inmate. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent’s determination.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that respondent has agreed to annul his determination and return the matter to the Retirement System for further proceedings. We therefore conclude that this matter is moot, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all the relief that he is entitled (see Matter of Stage v DiNapoli, 86 AD3d 857, 858 [2011]; Matter of Neeley v Town of Colonie, 79 AD3d 1560, 1561 [2010]).

Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.3d 1362, 934 N.Y.2d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amarena-v-dinapoli-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack