Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

282 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2008·No. 08-1226·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Disamodha C. Amarasinghe and Narlie Amarasinghe appeal from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the Amarasinghes’ income tax for 2002. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Amara *229 singhe v. Comm’r. of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 06-15883 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 282 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2008).

282 F. App'x 228 (Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hackenberg v. Comm'r
2010 T.C. Summary Opinion 135 (U.S. Tax Court, 2010)
Benzin v. Comm'r
2009 T.C. Summary Opinion 198 (U.S. Tax Court, 2009)