Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 282 F. App'x 228 (Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Disamodha C. Amarasinghe and Narlie Amarasinghe appeal from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the Amarasinghes’ income tax for 2002. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Amara *229 singhe v. Comm’r. of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 06-15883 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 F. App'x 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amarasinghe-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-2008.