Amaranto v. Garcia

D. Connecticut

Amaranto v. Garcia

142 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24628, 2001 WL 514169

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut

DecidedMay 9, 2001

DocketNo. 3:00CV1949 (AWT)

StatusPublished

This text of 142 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (Amaranto v. Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amaranto v. Garcia, 142 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24628, 2001 WL 514169 (D. Conn. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This matter came on for consideration of the notice of appeal of the bankruptcy court’s ruling of September 13, 2000 before the Honorable Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge, and

The court having considered the full record of this case and the applicable principles of law, and having entered an endorsement order dismissing the appeal for failure to respond as instructed on April 10, 2001, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment enter for the ap-pellee, Daniel Garcia, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This matter came on for consideration of the notice of appeal of the bankruptcy court’s ruling of September 13, 2000 before the Honorable Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge, and

The court having considered the full record of this case and the applicable principles of law, and having entered an endorsement order dismissing the appeal for failure to respond as instructed on April 10, 2001, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment enter for the ap-pellee, Daniel Garcia, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24628, 2001 WL 514169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amaranto-v-garcia-ctd-2001.