Amarame v. Gates

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2010
Docket09-7820
StatusUnpublished

This text of Amarame v. Gates (Amarame v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amarame v. Gates, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7820

ELVIS JOSEPH AMARAME,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT GATES, in his individual capacity; JOSEPH OWENS, in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:07-cv-02775-HFF)

Submitted: November 17, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elvis Joseph Amarame, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Elvis Joseph Amarame appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amarame v. Gates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amarame-v-gates-ca4-2010.