Amaram v. Virginia State University

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1278

DONATUS I. AMARAM, Ph.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; W. ERIC THOMAS, Ph.D., In his Official Capacity as Provost,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00444-JRS)

Submitted: December 14, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Marcus Scriven, SCRIVEN LAW OFFICES, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, William Cleveland Mims, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Sydney E. Rab, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donatus I. Amaram appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his claims of discrimination, retaliation, violation of

due process, and breach of contract against his employer Virginia

State University and its Provost. We have reviewed the briefs and

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Amaram v. Virginia

State University, No. 3:06-cv-00444-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2006

and Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -