Amanzimtoti Properties, LLC. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Abrash Aronbayev, Pointe West Central Village, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Amanzimtoti Properties, LLC. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Abrash Aronbayev, Pointe West Central Village, etc.

204 So. 3d 468, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 2016

Docket4D15-2466

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 So. 3d 468 (Amanzimtoti Properties, LLC. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Abrash Aronbayev, Pointe West Central Village, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amanzimtoti Properties, LLC. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Abrash Aronbayev, Pointe West Central Village, etc., 204 So. 3d 468, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9597 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, except to the extent it awarded attorney’s fees. On the fee issue, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. 1

After the foreclosure trial was held before a magistrate, the trial court entered a foreclosure judgment, including an award of attorney’s fees, without further hearing. As to the award of attorney’s fees, the court found: “Given the amount of the fee requested and the labor expended, the Court finds that a lodestar analysis is not necessary and that the flat fee is reasonable.” On appeal, appellant argues that there was no evidence in support of the reasonableness of the award of attorney’s fees.

“Reasonable attorney’s fees generally are not liquidated damages and require a hearing. Absent an evidentiary hearing, the fee award will be reversed for a hearing unless there is an indication that the right to' a hearing was waived.” Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So.3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “An award of attorney’s fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence and contain express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved.” Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So.2d 505, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The requirement of demonstrating the reasonableness of attorney’s fees applies to awards of flat fees as well. Raza v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 100 So.3d 121, 125-26 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Here, the issue of attorney’s fees was never addressed at the foreclosure trial, the trial court never held an evidentiary hearing on fees, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that appellant waived the right to an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on fees.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

TAYLOR, MAY, JJ., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

1

. Without further comment, we affirm as to all other issues raised in this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, except to the extent it awarded attorney’s fees. On the fee issue, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. 1

After the foreclosure trial was held before a magistrate, the trial court entered a foreclosure judgment, including an award of attorney’s fees, without further hearing. As to the award of attorney’s fees, the court found: “Given the amount of the fee requested and the labor expended, the Court finds that a lodestar analysis is not necessary and that the flat fee is reasonable.” On appeal, appellant argues that there was no evidence in support of the reasonableness of the award of attorney’s fees.

“Reasonable attorney’s fees generally are not liquidated damages and require a hearing. Absent an evidentiary hearing, the fee award will be reversed for a hearing unless there is an indication that the right to' a hearing was waived.” Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So.3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “An award of attorney’s fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence and contain express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved.” Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So.2d 505, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The requirement of demonstrating the reasonableness of attorney’s fees applies to awards of flat fees as well. Raza v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 100 So.3d 121, 125-26 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Here, the issue of attorney’s fees was never addressed at the foreclosure trial, the trial court never held an evidentiary hearing on fees, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that appellant waived the right to an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on fees.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

TAYLOR, MAY, JJ., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

1

. Without further comment, we affirm as to all other issues raised in this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 So. 3d 468, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amanzimtoti-properties-llc-v-ocwen-loan-servicing-llc-abrash-aronbayev-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack