Amanullah and Wahidullah v. Charles T. Cobb, Etc.

First Circuit

Amanullah and Wahidullah v. Charles T. Cobb, Etc.

872 F.2d 11, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 20818, 1989 WL 36938

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amanullah and Wahidullah v. Charles T. Cobb, Etc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 862 F.2d 362 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 20, 1989·No. 87-1695·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

Appellees’ counsel having advised this Court that petitioners, appellees, Amanul-lah and Wahidullah, had been granted asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1158 and having requested that the judgment of the district court, 673 F.Supp. 28, should be dismissed as moot and the appellant not objecting to this request,

*12 It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be vacated as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF COURT

Appellees’ counsel having advised this Court that petitioners, appellees, Amanul-lah and Wahidullah, had been granted asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1158 and having requested that the judgment of the district court, 673 F.Supp. 28, should be dismissed as moot and the appellant not objecting to this request,

*12 It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be vacated as moot.

Amanullah and Wahidullah v. Charles T. Cobb, Etc., 872 F.2d 11, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 20818, 1989 WL 36938 (1st Cir. 1989).

Pincite

872 F.2d 11 (Amanullah and Wahidullah v. Charles T. Cobb, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related