Amann v. St. Clairs Restaurant Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amann v. St. Clairs Restaurant Corp.

38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5517

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 700 (Amann v. St. Clairs Restaurant Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amann v. St. Clairs Restaurant Corp., 38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 4, 1971, in favor of the plaintiff-respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs and disbursements to abide the event, unless plaintiff within 20 days of service upon her by the defendant-appellant of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry thereon, stipulates to accept $75,000 in lieu of the amount awarded her by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and, as thus modified, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the amount awarded by the jury is excessive and that a verdict in excess of the amount indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 4, 1971, in favor of the plaintiff-respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs and disbursements to abide the event, unless plaintiff within 20 days of service upon her by the defendant-appellant of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry thereon, stipulates to accept $75,000 in lieu of the amount awarded her by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and, as thus modified, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the amount awarded by the jury is excessive and that a verdict in excess of the amount indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 700, 328 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amann-v-st-clairs-restaurant-corp-nyappdiv-1972.