Amann v. Edmonds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amann v. Edmonds

306 A.D.2d 362, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 362 (Amann v. Edmonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amann v. Edmonds, 306 A.D.2d 362, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages [363]*363for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated June 10, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict (J. Leone, J.), in favor of the defendants and against her on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the trial court properly allowed a statement contained in her hospital records regarding the cause of her fall to be admitted into evidence. The statement was inconsistent with the plaintiff’s position at trial and the defendants established, by the testimony of the nurse who recorded the statement, that the plaintiff was the source of the statement (see Echeverria v City of New York, 166 AD2d 409 [1990]; Castro v Alden Leeds, Inc., 144 AD2d 613 [1988]; Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 8-310, at 611 [Farrell 11th ed]). Accordingly, the statement was properly admitted into evidence (see Reed v McCord, 160 NY 330 [1899]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages [363]*363for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated June 10, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict (J. Leone, J.), in favor of the defendants and against her on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the trial court properly allowed a statement contained in her hospital records regarding the cause of her fall to be admitted into evidence. The statement was inconsistent with the plaintiff’s position at trial and the defendants established, by the testimony of the nurse who recorded the statement, that the plaintiff was the source of the statement (see Echeverria v City of New York, 166 AD2d 409 [1990]; Castro v Alden Leeds, Inc., 144 AD2d 613 [1988]; Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 8-310, at 611 [Farrell 11th ed]). Accordingly, the statement was properly admitted into evidence (see Reed v McCord, 160 NY 330 [1899]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 362, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amann-v-edmonds-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack