Amanda Jane Stanley v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 15, 2015
• Docket: 02-14-00420-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

l-n-ter £3: Cogrf- ()-p Appeals NJumfegf-r o^'N-o^ao-^ -RECS-' get OA~^-AO^/-^jP

JAN+H 0J5 To a O.hvjurt-Oa^e. Mu«v\iw .' (LR \£Ss% COURT OF A! Z* OF TEXAS CA yU>99 SECOND DISTRiq DEBRASP1SA! ,CLERK

S>\\\k'. Amanda Jaop Mankn, v. Th^ Sia&L q-P T^cfl-s

^ U)dHt# ))kt UX ^ /)/M£r #!• a fhlksrr Lbrtr-f. fT^r (f\U rcy^, -^uu^M- -fo otppc*d )&. -^AY^UOi,

•

i

-

L\ X P>mar\^ ^anle^ totsh-to

b^cK. swXijJif ILJ^iy ^ u ^ 5&nt -foSQ-tP 0f\irr\a^^ 'S~, i^j "X £mf\ flhh_oir bYvot s"-fr^W. X- -^rrhf g( 4h -li u x^y 6Qu^cTy^s: OAdi^rvg QQurds at\d s^fc- ioU: Aooru H^gQg^L te <^ : X\^- p\6Lce is hcrrik>)i.

^p-verc, ~x w^-s rc^.^g ^ fo ^o -to.S^ Q^n'.^n.-^. X QlSo torb-U A\\> rmi^ ^huk , Xm&.-ft>^ o^a Vk^i^ TVjpV. IV^Pr^ bi&e> ]^tJ- [\Q_S4fai_ o-£ h^ipinpi m^ JUSdr VoirJ^g/ CQ€ 0U> v^Pin4-xfNru ^tljofi-fe^ r t wv^Wrr/ nr cJ(Y*r-^s Q fbpywd s ^\cX f-f X aiv~^ ^K&— C^Tip^ wvfcv innft-hftK MfKfaf t ioqui J jr QTU n\s^- £>Q X cVd (Yvi -fr? Vyflgp /y\M jV^QLCtVv- BXui

l£ \for\ $u£L CnS\\ pu>^ ffftpflr, X XOOAJx jfr Vx CS&burtQ .f^' £ =*= v— ^ » t LW 1_^ i£J^— ^^' =_^

-hvivc-. X b^Uri We a to\o <^k-

_ Y^ftrVM WliA PrW^j -fm.yu VV}L| VvdS w~ cM>Lg*^ AX huilnloQ/u? 11 \Sbfci l) i/W \\r\ H^U' D-f 2.;W

U%.. ^ : \ Y\ k

& m

J tf» P- ^tr vr m g*> l.i

•5? fcft ™ 6K 2: H5S

IX •c

JO rA

4- o

Q X-x

A o

£ lo ^