Amanatullah v. Obama

Supreme Court

Amanatullah v. Obama

135 S. Ct. 1545, 191 L. Ed. 2d 633, 83 U.S.L.W. 3742, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2076

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 23, 2015

DocketNo. 14–148.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S. Ct. 1545 (Amanatullah v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amanatullah v. Obama, 135 S. Ct. 1545, 191 L. Ed. 2d 633, 83 U.S.L.W. 3742, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2076 (U.S. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion *1546On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Petitions in these cases seek review of the judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Al-Najar v. Obama,No. 12-5401, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), and Amanatullah v. Obama,No. 12-5407, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013). They do not seek review of judgments in Al-Maqaleh v. Hagel,No. 12-5404, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), or Al Bakri v. Obama,No. 12-5399, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), which were consolidated with petitioners' appeals. Subsequent to decisions of the court below, petitioners were transferred from custody of the United States to custody of other nations. As a result, these cases have become moot. Motion of petitioner in No. 14-6575 for leave to proceed n forma pauperisgranted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgments vacated with respect to these petitioners. See United States v. Munsingwear,340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); al-Marri v. Spagone,555 U.S. 1220, 129 S.Ct. 1545, 173 L.Ed.2d 671 (2009).

Justice KAGANtook no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion *1546On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Petitions in these cases seek review of the judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Al-Najar v. Obama,No. 12-5401, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), and Amanatullah v. Obama,No. 12-5407, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013). They do not seek review of judgments in Al-Maqaleh v. Hagel,No. 12-5404, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), or Al Bakri v. Obama,No. 12-5399, 2013 WL 6767861 (CADC 2013), which were consolidated with petitioners' appeals. Subsequent to decisions of the court below, petitioners were transferred from custody of the United States to custody of other nations. As a result, these cases have become moot. Motion of petitioner in No. 14-6575 for leave to proceed n forma pauperisgranted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgments vacated with respect to these petitioners. See United States v. Munsingwear,340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); al-Marri v. Spagone,555 U.S. 1220, 129 S.Ct. 1545, 173 L.Ed.2d 671 (2009).

Justice KAGANtook no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S. Ct. 1545, 191 L. Ed. 2d 633, 83 U.S.L.W. 3742, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amanatullah-v-obama-scotus-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack