Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 893, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Cust. Ct. 268 →
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Weibull sugar blending and conditioning machinery and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Union Sugar Div., Consolidated Foods Corp. (54 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 892), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 893, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1691 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 893 (Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.