Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 355 F.2d 195 (Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Amalgamated Clothing Workers, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 324 F.2d 228 (2d Cir. 1963), we found that the Board was in error in holding that a certain clause that had been orally agreed upon was included by implication in the 1961 collective agreement between the parties. We therefore returned the case to the Board and the Board later issued a cease and desist order.
A similar controversy has arisen with respect to the 1963 collective agreement. However, the evidence as to the 1963 negotiations does not establish the existence of an oral agreement. Moreover, the executed contract contains a clause stating that the writing embodies the entire agreement.
On the record as a whole, we find that there was substantial evidence to support the result reached by the Board. See Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amalgamated-clothing-workers-of-america-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca2-1965.