Amador v. Justices of Town Court of North Castle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amador v. Justices of Town Court of North Castle

47 A.D.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9020

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 746 (Amador v. Justices of Town Court of North Castle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amador v. Justices of Town Court of North Castle, 47 A.D.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to give petitioner, and all others similarly charged with certain misdemeanors, prompt probable cause hearings, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 4, 1974, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs. Since petitioner was indicted by a Grand Jury for, among other things, the misdemeanor charges, and since he subsequently pleaded guilty to reduced charges in satisfaction of the indictment, the assertion that respondents should have provided him with a preliminary hearing is academic. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to give petitioner, and all others similarly charged with certain misdemeanors, prompt probable cause hearings, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 4, 1974, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs. Since petitioner was indicted by a Grand Jury for, among other things, the misdemeanor charges, and since he subsequently pleaded guilty to reduced charges in satisfaction of the indictment, the assertion that respondents should have provided him with a preliminary hearing is academic. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amador-v-justices-of-town-court-of-north-castle-nyappdiv-1975.