Amador v. Amador

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Amador v. Amador

728 So. 2d 1209, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3104, 1999 WL 141812

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2460

StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 1209 (Amador v. Amador) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amador v. Amador, 728 So. 2d 1209, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3104, 1999 WL 141812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered an interim order directing the husband to vacate the marital home during the pendency of the matrimonial action. After review of the trial court’s remarks at the conclusion of the transcript, this court is in doubt about whether the trial court determined that the circumstances of this case rise to the level contemplated by Kranz v. Kranz, 542 So.2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We vacate the order and remand for consideration in light of Kranz.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered an interim order directing the husband to vacate the marital home during the pendency of the matrimonial action. After review of the trial court’s remarks at the conclusion of the transcript, this court is in doubt about whether the trial court determined that the circumstances of this case rise to the level contemplated by Kranz v. Kranz, 542 So.2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We vacate the order and remand for consideration in light of Kranz.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 1209, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3104, 1999 WL 141812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amador-v-amador-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack