Amado Barron Estrada v. Abel Nafrawi

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 11, 2004
Docket13-03-00769-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Amado Barron Estrada v. Abel Nafrawi (Amado Barron Estrada v. Abel Nafrawi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amado Barron Estrada v. Abel Nafrawi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-769-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________



AMADO BARRON ESTRADA, Appellant,



v.


ABEL NAFRAWI, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 156th District Court
of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, AMADO BARRON ESTRADA, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause no. B-02-1276-CV-B. The clerk's record was received on December 30, 2003.

Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was granted an extension of time to respond to this Court's notice; however, to date, appellant has failed to file a response as requested by this Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed this

the 11th day of March, 2004.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amado Barron Estrada v. Abel Nafrawi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amado-barron-estrada-v-abel-nafrawi-texapp-2004.