Amadasu v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Inc.

10 A.D.3d 571, 782 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11023
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.D.3d 571 (Amadasu v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amadasu v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Inc., 10 A.D.3d 571, 782 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[572]*572Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered May 7, 2003, which, in this action for breach of contract and wrongful termination, granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against her and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to compel further discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the hospital defendants were under no obligation to renew his medical residency contract. The contract plainly provided that it was for a one-year term and was renewable only by mutual written agreement. Accordingly, defendant-respondent, plaintiffs residency supervisor, did not breach the contract when she informed plaintiff that his contract would not be renewed. Nor does plaintiffs subsequent termination from the residency training program prior to the expiration of his contract furnish grounds for a wrongful termination claim. His termination, based on his inappropriate and unprofessional treatment of a 13-year-old female patient during an unauthorized pelvic examination, was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see Meller v Tancer, 174 AD2d 374, 375 [1991]) and was clearly in accordance with the residency contract pursuant to which termination of a resident was authorized for behavior deleterious to the hospital or the hospital’s patients (see Roth v Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 180 AD2d 434, 435 [1992]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knapik v. Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital
90 F. Supp. 3d 292 (D. Vermont, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.3d 571, 782 N.Y.S.2d 82, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amadasu-v-bronx-lebanon-hospital-center-inc-nyappdiv-2004.