A.M. v. State

723 So. 2d 383, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 1998 WL 941092
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 1998
DocketNo. 97-03658
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 723 So. 2d 383 (A.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.M. v. State, 723 So. 2d 383, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 1998 WL 941092 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

A.M., a juvenile, challenges his adjudication of delinquency and his commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice. He contends the trial court erred in allowing him to enter an uncounseled plea, without conducting an adequate inquiry into his comprehension of the waiver of counsel or of the voluntariness of his guilty plea. The State correctly concedes error. See J.R.V. v. State, 715 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); D.V.L. v. State, 693 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA [384]*3841997). We therefore remand this cause for further proceedings and do not reach the other issues AM. has raised.

Reversed.

QUINCE and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PLS v. State
745 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
723 So. 2d 383, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 1998 WL 941092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/am-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.