A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.)

Supreme Court of Alabama

A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.)

236 So. 3d 90

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 28, 2017·No. 1150955·Published

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Main, and Wise, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Main, and Wise, JJ., concur.

A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.), 236 So. 3d 90 (Ala. 2017).

Pincite

236 So. 3d 90 (A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related