A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.)

236 So. 3d 90
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 28, 2017
Docket1150955
StatusPublished

This text of 236 So. 3d 90 (A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.M. v. Colbert Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (Ex parte A.M.), 236 So. 3d 90 (Ala. 2017).

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Main, and Wise, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 So. 3d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/am-v-colbert-cnty-dept-of-human-res-ex-parte-am-ala-2017.