AM-RO HOLDINGS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2021·No. 20-0016·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 17, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-16

Lower Tribunal No. 13-37976

AM-RO Holdings, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Henriques Law + Mediation Group, P.A., and G.O.L. Henriques, for appellant.

Cooney Trybus Kwavnick Peets, PLC, and Warren B. Kwavnick (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. Stat. § 627.4136(1) (2019) (“It shall be a condition precedent to the accrual or maintenance of a cause of action against a liability insurer by a person not an insured under the terms of the liability insurance contract that such person shall first obtain a settlement or verdict against a person who is an insured under the terms of such policy for a cause of action which is covered by such policy.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AM-RO HOLDINGS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

AM-RO HOLDINGS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. (AM-RO HOLDINGS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 627.4136
Florida § 627.4136(1)