Am. River Water & Mining Co. v. Bear River Water & Mining Co.
11 Cal. 339
Opinion
Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
There is in the record no properly authenticated statement of the case, and our examination must be confined to the judgment roll, which, being regular on its face, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Am. River Water & Mining Co. v. Bear River Water & Mining Co., 11 Cal. 339 (Cal. 1858).
11 Cal. 339 (Am. River Water & Mining Co. v. Bear River Water & Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crawford's Estate
160 A. 585 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Henderson v. Morris
5 Or. 24 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1873)