Am. Mun. Power Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Am. Mun. Power Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp. (Slip Opinion)

2016 Ohio 3431

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 16, 2016

Docket2014-1847

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 Ohio 3431 (Am. Mun. Power Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp. (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Am. Mun. Power Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 3431 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Am. Mun. Power, Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-3431.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-3431 AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC. v. BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Am. Mun. Power, Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-3431.] Certified question sua sponte declined—Cause dismissed. (No. 2014-1847—Submitted October 27, 2015—Decided June 16, 2016.) ON ORDER from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Certifying a Question of State Law, No. 2:11-cv-131. ____________________ {¶ 1} Having considered all the arguments in this case, the court, sua sponte, exercises its discretion under S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.01(A), declines to answer the certified question, and dismisses the cause. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. KENNEDY and FRENCH, JJ., dissent. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

__________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Stephen C. Fitch, David J. Butler, and Celia M. Kilgard; and Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram and Judah Lifschitz, for petitioner. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., William G. Porter, and Douglas R. Matthews; and Pepper Hamilton, L.L.P., Michael P. Subak, and Richard W. Folz Jr., for respondent. Wesp Barwell, L.L.C., and Gregory P. Barwell, for amicus curiae, Ohio Counsel of Retail Merchants, in support of respondent. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Am. Mun. Power, Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-3431.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-3431 AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC. v. BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Am. Mun. Power, Inc. v. Bechtel Power Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-3431.] Certified question sua sponte declined—Cause dismissed. (No. 2014-1847—Submitted October 27, 2015—Decided June 16, 2016.) ON ORDER from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Certifying a Question of State Law, No. 2:11-cv-131. ____________________ {¶ 1} Having considered all the arguments in this case, the court, sua sponte, exercises its discretion under S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.01(A), declines to answer the certified question, and dismisses the cause. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. KENNEDY and FRENCH, JJ., dissent. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

__________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Stephen C. Fitch, David J. Butler, and Celia M. Kilgard; and Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram and Judah Lifschitz, for petitioner. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., William G. Porter, and Douglas R. Matthews; and Pepper Hamilton, L.L.P., Michael P. Subak, and Richard W. Folz Jr., for respondent. Wesp Barwell, L.L.C., and Gregory P. Barwell, for amicus curiae, Ohio Counsel of Retail Merchants, in support of respondent. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 3431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/am-mun-power-inc-v-bechtel-power-corp-slip-opinion-ohio-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack