Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. Cleveland

825 N.E.2d 620, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1496

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 13, 2005

Docket2005-0161

StatusPublished

This text of 825 N.E.2d 620 (Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. Cleveland, 825 N.E.2d 620, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 83676, 2004-Ohio-6416. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 11, 2005:

‘Whether R.C. 1.63 is a general law for purposes of Ohio’s Home Rule Amendment.

“Under a home rule analysis, whether local predatory lending ordinances that impose stricter requirements on lending transactions conflict with the state’s predatory lending statutes.”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0160, Am. Financial Serv. Assn., Cuyahoga App. No. 83676, 2004-Ohio-6416.

The conflict case is Dayton v. State, 157 Ohio App.3d 736, 2004-Ohio-3141, 813 N.E.2d 707.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI