Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided May 14, 2020·No. E2019-01158-COA-R3-CV·Published

Opinion

05/14/2020

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

January 22, 2020 Session

ALYSIA REESE MCCRACKEN HANCOCK v.

BJR ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-416-18 Deborah C. Stevens, Judge

No. E2019-01158-COA-R3-CV

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., concurring.

I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the Trial Court. I agree the authorization form was so insufficient as not to allow the medical providers to obtain medical records from the other providers. I, however, continue to adhere to the position as stated in my dissent in Parks v. Walker, 585 S.W.3d 895, 900 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018) that if a medical authorization form along with other information provided to the healthcare providers is sufficient to enable them to obtain a plaintiff’s records simply by asking, then there is substantial compliance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-121(a)(2)(E).

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, CHIEF JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).

Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring (Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 29-26-121
Tennessee § 29-26-121(a)(2)(E)