Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring
This text of Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring (Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
05/14/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 22, 2020 Session
ALYSIA REESE MCCRACKEN HANCOCK v. BJR ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-416-18 Deborah C. Stevens, Judge ___________________________________
No. E2019-01158-COA-R3-CV ___________________________________
D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., concurring.
I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the Trial Court. I agree the authorization form was so insufficient as not to allow the medical providers to obtain medical records from the other providers. I, however, continue to adhere to the position as stated in my dissent in Parks v. Walker, 585 S.W.3d 895, 900 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018) that if a medical authorization form along with other information provided to the healthcare providers is sufficient to enable them to obtain a plaintiff’s records simply by asking, then there is substantial compliance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-121(a)(2)(E).
____________________________________ D. MICHAEL SWINEY, CHIEF JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alysia Reese McCracken Hancock v. BJR Enterprises, LLC - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alysia-reese-mccracken-hancock-v-bjr-enterprises-llc-concurring-tennctapp-2020.