Alvord v. United States

99 U.S. 593, 25 L. Ed. 399, 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1579
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 18, 1879·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

This application comes directly within the rule laid down in Hurley v. Jones, 97 U. S. 318. As we took occasion to say in that case, “ our rules requiring causes to be ready for hearing when reached are and will continue to be rigidly enforced.” We recognize no pro forma attorneys of record. Counsel who enter their appearance under the requirements of Rule 9 must understand that the court will hold them responsible for all that such an entry implies until they relieve themselves from the obligation they assume, by substitution or otherwise.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvord v. United States, 99 U.S. 593, 25 L. Ed. 399, 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1579 (1879).

99 U.S. 593 (Alvord v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Schlocht-Meyer
69 F. 592 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1895)
Florsheim v. Schilling
26 F. 256 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)