Alvin Ross v. James Tilton
This text of 420 F. App'x 723 (Alvin Ross v. James Tilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
California state prisoner Alvin Ronnel Ross appeals pro se from the district *724 court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to reconsider because Ross has failed to demonstrate mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, or any other basis for relief from judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); see also Molloy, 878 F.2d at 316.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F. App'x 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvin-ross-v-james-tilton-ca9-2011.