Alvin Ray Cooper v. State
This text of Alvin Ray Cooper v. State (Alvin Ray Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-13-00277-CR
ALVIN RAY COOPER, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 242nd District Court Hale County, Texas Trial Court No. A19357-1211, Honorable Edward Lee Self, Presiding
February 20, 2014
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Alvin Ray Cooper, appellant, appeals his conviction for forgery. Appellant timely
perfected his appeal. The appellate record and appellant’s and state’s briefs have been
filed. Pending before the court is the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s attorney. In
it, counsel contends that he was appointed to represent appellant; however, appellant
has “threatened to file a complaint against Counsel with the State Bar of Texas, thus
creating a conflict of interest between attorney and client and further creating a circumstance wherein it is impossible for Counsel to properly represent [appellant]
before this Court.”
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 242nd District
Court of Hale County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether appellant is indigent;
3. whether a conflict of interest exists between appellant and appellant's attorney necessitating the removal of the appellant's attorney; and,
4. whether new counsel should be appointed due to a conflict of interest between appellant and counsel.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by March 24, 2014.
If it is determined that appellant is indigent and a conflict of interest exists, the trial court
may appoint him new counsel; the name, address and phone number of any new
counsel appointed shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should further time
be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before March 24,
2014.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alvin Ray Cooper v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvin-ray-cooper-v-state-texapp-2014.