Alvie Robinson v. Alicia Scott and Branden Mullens
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00158-CV
ALVIE ROBINSON, Appellant v.
ALICIA SCOTT AND BRANDEN MULLENS, Appellees
From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,737
ORDER
Rather than file a motion for extension of time to file his brief because he had not
received a copy of the reporter’s record, appellant, Alvie Robinson, filed his brief without
access to the reporter’s record. Accordingly, the brief contains no citations to the record
as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i). Because
his brief is defective, we strike it without prejudice to refiling another brief which is due
60 days after the date of this order. Additionally, a copy of the reporter’s record is enclosed with this order. Appellant
is required to return the reporter’s record with his brief. The reporter’s record must be
preserved in the condition it is sent to appellant. It may not be disassembled or taken
apart for any reason, and it may not be marked upon. If it has been disassembled, or
taken apart, or marked on, or not returned with appellant’s brief, this appeal will be
dismissed.
Appellant’s brief is due 60 days from the date of this order.
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Brief stricken, brief due Order issued and filed September 21, 2016
Robinson v. Scott Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alvie Robinson v. Alicia Scott and Branden Mullens (Alvie Robinson v. Alicia Scott and Branden Mullens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.