Alves v. Adler Built Industries, Inc.

366 So. 2d 802
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1979
Docket77-1363, 77-1364, 78-45 and 78-106
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 366 So. 2d 802 (Alves v. Adler Built Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alves v. Adler Built Industries, Inc., 366 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

366 So.2d 802 (1979)

Elvin ALVES and Alicia Alves, Appellants,
v.
ADLER BUILT INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, North Causeway Townhouses, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Morton Adler, Individually, Appellees.

Nos. 77-1363, 77-1364, 78-45 and 78-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 9, 1979.
Rehearing Denied February 12, 1979.

*803 Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, Robert Sussman, Hialeah, for appellants.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman & Greer and Scott D. Sheftall; Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith & Spangler; Adams & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Miami, Sidney B. Shapiro, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals question the propriety of three summary judgments in a negligence action. Joyce Alves, a two-year-old child, drowned while playing in and about a sand pile adjacent to a lake on property next to her parents' home.

We affirm because the negligence of the defendants, if any (which we do not rule upon), was not the proximate cause of the accident. The negligence on the part of the parents in failing to properly supervise the two-year-old child, when they were on notice of the propensity of the child to play in and about the sand pile, was the proximate cause of her demise.[1]Orefice v. Albert, 237 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1970); Perotta v. Tri-State Insurance Company, 317 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); 59 Am.Jur.2d, Parent and Child, § 14.

In view of our ruling as to the proximate cause being a bar to this action, the other points raised in the several briefs have not been considered. Therefore, the summary judgments here under review are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

KEHOE, J., dissents.

NOTES

[1] Chuck K. Davis (the construction superintendent) took the child home on at least one occasion and gave her to her mother. Vincent Pepe (the watchman) took her home a couple of times and told the people the child was near the water. Bertram M. McCall (a laborer) took her home from the site on at least two or three occasions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International Action Sports, Inc. v. Sabellico
573 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kohler v. Medline Industries, Inc.
453 So. 2d 908 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
City of Jacksonville v. Raulerson
415 So. 2d 1303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Walters v. GREENGLADE VILLAS
399 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Selfe v. Smith
397 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cassel v. Price
396 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Quest v. Joseph
392 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
John H. Kroon v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, Etc.
628 F.2d 891 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Beaches Hospital v. Lee
384 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Clement v. Rousselle Corp.
372 So. 2d 1156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 So. 2d 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alves-v-adler-built-industries-inc-fladistctapp-1979.