Alverio v. State

630 So. 2d 233, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1994 WL 26839
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1994·No. No. 93-2917·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely is discharged. See State ex rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla.1975). On the merits, the order denying the appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is affirmed because the motion was itself untimely filed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alverio v. State, 630 So. 2d 233, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 426, 1994 WL 26839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

630 So. 2d 233 (Alverio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal
316 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)