Alvarez v. Unicco

958 So. 2d 951, 2007 WL 1146453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 2007
Docket1D06-1465
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 958 So. 2d 951 (Alvarez v. Unicco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. Unicco, 958 So. 2d 951, 2007 WL 1146453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

958 So.2d 951 (2007)

Cruz Elena ALVAREZ, Appellant,
v.
UNICCO and Travelers, Appellees.

No. 1D06-1465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2007.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 2007.

Martha D. Fornaris of Fornaris & Associates, P.A., Coral Gables, and Bill McCabe *952 of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for Appellant.

Robin Ross, Ft. Lauderdale, and William H. Rogner of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, Waranch & Westcott, Winter Park, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation appeal, Cruz Elena Alvarez, who claimed sustaining workplace accidents on February 28, 2003 and on January 1, 2004, appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims which denied her claim for benefits on the ground that she knowingly and intentionally made a false or misleading statement for the purpose of securing workers' compensation benefits. See §§ 440.09(4) and 440.105(4)(b)1, Florida Statutes (2003). Claimant argues that she is entitled to workers' compensation benefits until the date that the judge of compensation claims found that she did make a knowing and intentional misrepresentation or misstatement. Alvarez, who does not dispute the judge's findings, cites no authority for holding that the judge erred in this case in not awarding benefits for the period prior to the entry of the order. Further, neither this court's decision in Horizons Painting v. Lessard, 688 So.2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), nor our decision in Pavilion Apartments v. Wetherington, 943 So.2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), require an award by the judge of compensation claims for a period preceding the determination of a violation of section 440.09(4).

Accordingly, the order of the judge of compensation claims is AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tony Joe Leggett v. Barnett Marine, Inc. and Sea Bright etc.
167 So. 3d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Carroso v. State
129 So. 3d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Parodi v. Florida Contracting Co., Inc.
16 So. 3d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 So. 2d 951, 2007 WL 1146453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-unicco-fladistctapp-2007.