Alvarez v. State
916 So. 2d 65, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19705, 2005 WL 3409623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alvarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 890 So. 2d 389 →
Opinion
The order below, entered after an extensive evidentiary hearing, denied the appellant’s application for relief from a judgment affirmed in Alvarez v. State, 774 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 791 So.2d 1094 (Fla.2001), on grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. That order is itself affirmed. See Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175, 125 S.Ct. 551, 160 L.Ed.2d 565 (2004); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alvarez v. State, 916 So. 2d 65, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19705, 2005 WL 3409623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
916 So. 2d 65 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Florida v. Nixon
543 U.S. 175 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Alvarez v. State
774 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)