Alvarez v. State

785 So. 2d 1240, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7179, 2001 WL 543414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 2001·No. No. 4D01-411·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Alfredo Alvarez’ third motion to correct illegal sentence in which he raised the same meritless claim that his sentence for attempted premeditated murder with a firearm exceeds the 30 year maximum for a first degree felony under section 775.082(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). As the trial court has repeatedly and correctly explained to him, his offense was reclassified to a life felony because he used a firearm. See §§ 775.087(1)(a), 777.04(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1981). This court affirmed the two previous orders denying relief on this claim, and we do so again.

This latest appeal is proeedurally barred and constitutes an abuse of the judicial system. We hereby prohibit appellant from filing any pro se petition or appeal that raises this same issue in this court. If he violates this prohibition, he will face sanctions. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, C.J., DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 785 So. 2d 1240, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7179, 2001 WL 543414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 1240 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MB v. Department of Children and Families
785 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)