Alvarez v. State

700 So. 2d 1258, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12260, 1997 WL 698024
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1997·No. No. 97-2376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Salvador Raymundo Alvarez appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850. For the-following reasons, we reverse.

Alvarez claims his defense counsel misled him as to the amount of time he would actually serve on his concurrent fifteen-year sentences. He asserts that if he had not been misinformed regarding his eligibility for gain time and early release programs,- he would not have entered the plea.

“Misrepresentations by counsel as to the length of a sentence or eligibility for gain time can be the basis for postconviction relief in the form of leave to withdraw a guilty plea.” State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 236 (Fla.1996). The State acknowledges that a hearing will be necessary 'to determine the merits of Defendant’s claim. •,

Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 700 So. 2d 1258, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12260, 1997 WL 698024 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

700 So. 2d 1258 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvarez v. State
742 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)