Alvarez v. State
This text of 174 So. 333 (Alvarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment'of conviction is reversed on the authority of Pippin v. State, 102 Fla. 1124, 136 Sou. Rep. 883, for omission of the information, filed under Section 7157 C. G. L. charging robbery while armed with a *203 dangerous weapon, to allege the ownership of the property therein described as the object of; the robbery, or in lieu thereof that the owner thereof was unknown, as required under that decision. Such ownership, when alleged, may consist of a general or special property in the subject matter, but a complete omission of all allegation of ownership cannot be upheld as against a motion to quash duly and timely interposed in a case of this kind.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 So. 333, 128 Fla. 202, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-state-fla-1937.