Alvarez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. COMPANY

635 So. 2d 131, 1994 WL 123617
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 1994
Docket93-2287
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 635 So. 2d 131 (Alvarez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. COMPANY, 635 So. 2d 131, 1994 WL 123617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

635 So.2d 131 (1994)

Flavia ALVAREZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, as subrogee of Fay Roberts, Appellee.

No. 93-2287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 12, 1994.

*132 Wolpe, Leibowitz, Berger & Brotman and Steven Berger and Bradley H. Trushin, Miami, for appellant.

Stephen C. Shenkman & Associates and Jeffrey R. Roth, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below seeks review of an order denying her rule 1.540(b) motion to set aside a default and default judgment entered against her. We reverse.

Substituted service of process in this accident case was secured on Alvarez under section 48.031, Florida Statutes (1991) by serving her cousin at what was allegedly her "usual place of abode" at a home in Hialeah. The affidavits and supporting documentation — including a telephone bill and marriage license — submitted in support of appellant's motion below, however, established uncontradictedly that Alvarez was not living at that address on the date of service or for some time before. See Hunt Exterminating Co. v. Crum, 598 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Partrade, Inc. v. Marchiano, 566 So.2d 588 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Marshall Davis, Inc. v. Incapco, Inc., 558 So.2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). It is therefore apparent that the purported service of process was ineffective as a matter of law, see Kennedy v. Richmond, 512 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and that the default and default judgment were therefore void and must be set aside. See Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Sams Food Store, Inc. v. Alvarez, 443 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyman v. Canter, 389 So.2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silva v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
60 So. 3d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Clauro Enterprises, Inc. v. Aragon Galiano Holdings, LLC
16 So. 3d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Gonzalez
951 So. 2d 1037 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Busman v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE
905 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Torres v. Arnco Const., Inc.
867 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.
795 So. 2d 952 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 So. 2d 131, 1994 WL 123617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-company-fladistctapp-1994.