Alvarez v. New York City Housing Authority

203 A.D.2d 219, 612 N.Y.S.2d 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated February 24, 1992, as granted the infant plaintiff’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well established that the question of whether to grant [220] an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim is left to the sound discretion of the court (see, Ortega v New York City Hous. Auth., 167 AD2d 337). Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the infant plaintiff leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, King v City of New York, 90 AD2d 714). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. New York City Housing Authority, 203 A.D.2d 219, 612 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 219 (Alvarez v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew T.B. v. Brewster Central School District
18 A.D.3d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Tumm v. Town of Eastchester
8 A.D.3d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Traina v. Zambrana
209 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)