Alvarez v. Najera

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 11, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01894·Unknown

Opinion

TrA ist hto ar Cne hy a pG me an ne r (a Bl ar No. 12716) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Avenue, Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068 Phone: (702) 486-3107 Fax: (702) 486-2377 tchapman@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Respondents

Case No. 2:20-cv-01894-KJD-VCF Petitioner, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXHIBIT vs. UNDER SEAL

WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, et al.,

Respondents.

Respondents move for leave to file under seal Exhibit 32 in support of Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss to Alvarez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This motion is based upon the following points and authorities, as well as all pleadings, documents, and exhibits on file in this matter.

DATED this 5th day of May 2021.

Attorney General By: /s/ Trisha Chapman Trisha Chapman Deputy Attorney General

While there is a presumption favoring public access to judicial filings and documents, see Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978), a party seeking to seal a judicial record may overcome the presumption by demonstrating “compelling reasons” that outweigh the public policies favoring disclosure, Kamakana vy. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006) (citations omitted). In general, “compelling reasons” exist where the records may be used for improper purposes. Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179 (citing Nixon, 435 US. at 598). As a result, Respondents seek leave to file under seal the following exhibit: Exhibit 32 — Presentence Investigation Report (09/22/15)! Alvarez’s Presentence Investigation Report (PSI) is submitted as part of the state court record accompanying Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss Alvarez’s Petition and it contains confidential information, such as Alvarez’s identifiers, and his social security number. Pursuant to NEV. REV. STAT. 176.156(5), the contents of a presentence investigation report are confidential and must not be made a part of any public record. Because the state court never made the above-referenced pleading a part of the public record, Respondents wish to comply with the Nevada statute and the actions of the state court regarding the continued confidentiality of this document. Accordingly, there are “compelling reasons” to seal the PSI in this case. For these reasons, Respondents request that Exhibit 32 be filed under seal. DATED May 5, 2021. Attorney General By: ___/s/ Trisha Chapman Trisha Chapman Deputy Attorney General

Dated: 5/7/2021

Kent J. Dawson, U.S. District Judge ' Exhibit numbered consistent with Respondents’ Index of Exhibits in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Alvarez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 16).

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibit Under Seal with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system on May 5, 2021. I certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I will cause the foregoing document to be mailed by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery on or about May 6, 2021 to the following non-CM/ECF participants:

Francisco Alvarez, #1147691 c/o Southern Desert Correctional Center P.O. Box 208 Indian Springs, NV 89070

By: /s/ M. Landreth An employee of the Office of the Attorney General

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. Najera, (D. Nev. 2021).

Alvarez v. Najera (Alvarez v. Najera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
435 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1978)