Alvarez v. Mendik Realty Plaza, Inc.

176 A.D.2d 557
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1991·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered March 8, 1990, which, inter alia, awarded damages to plaintiffs upon a jury verdict in their favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On January 18, 1984, plaintiff sustained a herniated disc when he slipped and fell on debris lying on a stairway at Two Penn Plaza, which is managed by defendant. As a result, plaintiff underwent surgery the next month but nevertheless continued to suffer back pain up until the time of trial in October, 1989.

[558]*558We find that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to show that there was "a lack of ordinary care in the management of the premises at the time and place in question” (Quinlan v Cecchini, 41 NY2d 686, 690). Specifically, there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer that defendant had actual knowledge that vagrants customarily congregated on the stairway and discarded debris there which was regularly permitted to remain for an unreasonable period of time. The jury was therefore entitled to charge defendant with constructive knowledge of each reoccurrence of the hazardous condition (see, Morales v Jolee Consolidators, 173 AD2d 315; Weisenthal v Pickman, 153 AD2d 849). Under such circumstances the jury was entitled to find that the defendant "should reasonably have foreseen that, under the conditions which prevailed, it was only a matter of time until someone might be injured” (Quinlan v Cecchini, supra, at 690).

Plaintiffs’ testimony, when considered along with the medical records detailing Mr. Alvarez’ hospital stay and surgery, adequately established both causation and the permanency of Mr. Alvarez’ injury (Shaw v Tague, 257 NY 193). Moreover, we find that the jury’s determination that Mr. Alvarez’ apportioned liability for his fall was only 25% was not against the weight of the evidence (cf., Morales v Jolee Consolidators, supra) and that the damages awarded to each plaintiff fell within the range of reasonable compensation for the injuries suffered. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. Mendik Realty Plaza, Inc., 176 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 557 (Alvarez v. Mendik Realty Plaza, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. New York City Transit Authority
82 A.D.3d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Hughes v. Webb
40 A.D.3d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Jones v. Fried
21 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
O'Grady v. New York City Housing Authority
259 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Ramos v. New York City Housing Authority
249 A.D.2d 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Pidgeon v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
248 A.D.2d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Goodman v. United States
916 F. Supp. 362 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Gutz v. County of Monroe
221 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Falcaro v. Kessman
215 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Snyder v. Golub Corp.
199 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bronx County Public Administrator v. New York City Housing Authority
182 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)