Alvarez v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alvarez v. Lavine

49 A.D.2d 761, 373 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10748

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 761 (Alvarez v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarez v. Lavine, 49 A.D.2d 761, 373 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul so much of a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, dated May 3, 1974, as, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services to [762]*762withhold payments to petitioner’s daughter for homemaker services provided by the daughter, pending completion of investigation of the services actually rendered by her for petitioner. Petition dismissed, on the merits, and so much of the determination as was sought to be reviewed confirmed, without costs. On the record in this proceeding, there is substantial evidence to support the determination in question. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul so much of a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, dated May 3, 1974, as, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services to [762]*762withhold payments to petitioner’s daughter for homemaker services provided by the daughter, pending completion of investigation of the services actually rendered by her for petitioner. Petition dismissed, on the merits, and so much of the determination as was sought to be reviewed confirmed, without costs. On the record in this proceeding, there is substantial evidence to support the determination in question. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 761, 373 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1975.