Alvarez v. Junco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alvarez v. Junco

629 So. 2d 323, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685, 1993 WL 536028

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1993

DocketNo. 93-1014

StatusPublished

This text of 629 So. 2d 323 (Alvarez v. Junco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarez v. Junco, 629 So. 2d 323, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685, 1993 WL 536028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Orlando Alvarez, Frank Rotel-la, and Omayda Rotella appeal an adverse final judgment after bench trial.

Appellants were buyers under a contract for purchase and sale of real estate. A closing was held but buyers refused to close. Leaving aside the question whether buyers’ performance was excused because of the financing contingency in the contract, there was no substantial competent evidence establishing that the appellee sellers had provided a title insurance commitment to buyers, as the contract required. Under authority of Wood v. Ensworth, 430 So.2d 617, 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for appellants.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Orlando Alvarez, Frank Rotel-la, and Omayda Rotella appeal an adverse final judgment after bench trial.

Appellants were buyers under a contract for purchase and sale of real estate. A closing was held but buyers refused to close. Leaving aside the question whether buyers’ performance was excused because of the financing contingency in the contract, there was no substantial competent evidence establishing that the appellee sellers had provided a title insurance commitment to buyers, as the contract required. Under authority of Wood v. Ensworth, 430 So.2d 617, 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for appellants.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

629 So. 2d 323, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685, 1993 WL 536028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-junco-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack