Alvarez v. Jones

550 So. 2d 555, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2507, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6001, 1989 WL 125983
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1989·No. No. 88-2444·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

Having carefully reviewed the record and arguments of counsel, we find no merit to appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the appel-lees. A directed verdict is proper when the record conclusively shows an absence of facts or inferences from facts to support a jury verdict. Hartnett v. Fowler, 94 So.2d 724 (Fla.1957); Holmes v. Don Medley Chevrolet, Inc., 468 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Ferber v. Orange Blossom Center, Inc., 388 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

On cross-appeal, appellees Schill and Snyder correctly state that the trial court erred when it failed to consider their costs as the “party recovering judgment” pursuant to section 57.041(1), Florida Statutes (1987). See Hendry Tractor Co. v. Fernandez, 432 So.2d 1315 (Fla.1983).

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for the purpose [556] of taxing costs in favor of Schill and Snyder. In all other respects, the final judgment in favor of the appellees is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. Jones, 550 So. 2d 555, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2507, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6001, 1989 WL 125983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 555 (Alvarez v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferber v. ORANGE BLOSSOM CENTER, INC
388 So. 2d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hendry Tractor Co. v. Fernandez
432 So. 2d 1315 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Holmes v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc.
468 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hartnett v. Fowler
94 So. 2d 724 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)