Alvarez v. Hertz Corp.

327 So. 2d 791, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1976
DocketNo. 75-523
StatusPublished

This text of 327 So. 2d 791 (Alvarez v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. Hertz Corp., 327 So. 2d 791, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the plaintiff below, urges that the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment for the defendant, Hertz, in an action where the facts revealed that Hertz left the keys in a truck that it owned. The truck, which caused injury to the plaintiff, was stolen from defendant’s fenced lot in which a watchman was constantly in attendance. We hold that the court correctly entered summary judgment upon the facts viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff’s case. See Lingefelt v. Hanner, Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 325; Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc., Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 910; Clements v. Barber, Fla.App.1971, 258 So.2d 465.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lingefelt v. Hanner
125 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc.
127 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Clements v. Barber
258 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 So. 2d 791, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-hertz-corp-fladistctapp-1976.