Alvarez v. Hertz Corp.
This text of 327 So. 2d 791 (Alvarez v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, the plaintiff below, urges that the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment for the defendant, Hertz, in an action where the facts revealed that Hertz left the keys in a truck that it owned. The truck, which caused injury to the plaintiff, was stolen from defendant’s fenced lot in which a watchman was constantly in attendance. We hold that the court correctly entered summary judgment upon the facts viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff’s case. See Lingefelt v. Hanner, Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 325; Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc., Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 910; Clements v. Barber, Fla.App.1971, 258 So.2d 465.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 So. 2d 791, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-hertz-corp-fladistctapp-1976.