Alvarez v. Helms

• Court: District Court, E.D. Washington
• Decided: March 24, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-00085
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6

7 RAMON MARISCAL ALVAREZ, NO: 2:20-CV-0085-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING FILE, DISMISSAL 9 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

10 ZAGARY Z. HELMS, Yakima Police Officer; and THOMAS JEFFERSON, 11 Yakima Police Officer,

12 Defendants.

13 BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s purported Complaint (ECF No. 1) and 14 the Clerk’s Notice of Deficient Filing (ECF Nos. 2, 3). Having reviewed the file 15 and the records contained therein, the Court is fully informed. 16 On March 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint accompanied by an 17 attachment, Civil Cover Sheet, and Proposed Summons. ECF No. 1. The 18 Complaint was not accompanied by the required filing fee or an Application to 19 Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The Clerk of Court 20 provided notice of this deficiency to Plaintiff and warned him that the case is 1 || subject to dismissal unless the fee or application was filed by March 16, 2020. 2|| ECF Nos. 2, 3. Plaintiff was also advised that he did not properly sign his Complaint. The first Notice of Deficiency included a form Application to Proceed 4|| In Forma Pauperis, as well as a Complaint signature page. Plaintiff obviously 5|| receive the Notice because on March 9, 2020, he returned the signature page to his 6|| Complaint. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not comply with the filing fee or application 7|| to proceed in forma pauperis. 8 Payment of a filing fee is required to institute a suit in the United States 9|| District Courts, 28 U.S.C. § 1914, while the in forma pauperis statute allows the courts to waive the filing fee for indigent persons, 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Failure to 11 |} comply with either provision for instituting a suit warrants dismissal of the action. 12|| See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 1999) (appeal dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or be eligible for in forma pauperis status). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 15 This action is DISMISSED without Prejudice. The District Court 16|| Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and Judgment accordingly, furnish copies to Plaintiff at his last known address, and CLOSE the file. 18 DATED March 24, 2020. 19 a yy Ug PD. ee 0 Kees 20 on Xe THOMAS O. RICE <=> Chief United States District Judge